The Last Supper: A Detailed Briefing

Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper is not only an artistic masterpiece but also a monumental cultural icon that has influenced countless generations. Its creation, technique, innovative composition, and ongoing cultural resonance make it one of the most studied and celebrated works in the history of art. This article will provide a comprehensive briefing on the painting, highlighting its origins, artistic significance, deterioration, and lasting impact on the world.

I. Creation and Context

Commission

The Last Supper was commissioned by Ludovico Sforza, the Duke of Milan, between 1495 and 1498 for the refectory (dining hall) of the Santa Maria delle Grazie monastery in Milan. The commission was part of a broader renovation project aimed at enhancing the prestige of the Sforza family. The family mausoleum was also integrated into this renovation, and The Last Supper was intended to serve as a grand statement of both spiritual and political significance.

The fresco is much more than a religious work; it reflects the power dynamics and aspirations of Renaissance patrons. Sforza’s desire to immortalize his family within such a significant religious space speaks to the intertwined relationship between art and politics during this period.

Subject

The subject of the painting comes from one of the most dramatic moments in Christian theology—Jesus announcing during the Last Supper that one of his disciples would betray him. The scene is specifically drawn from the Gospel of John, where this betrayal is revealed, setting the stage for Christ’s eventual crucifixion. Leonardo captured the intense emotional reactions of the apostles, each expressing disbelief, shock, or even anger, as they ponder the implications of Christ’s words.

Technique

Leonardo was never content to simply follow tradition. While fresco painting, a method where pigments are applied directly onto wet plaster, was the standard for murals at the time, Leonardo opted for a more experimental approach. He used tempera mixed with gesso, pitch, and mastic on a stone wall. This method gave him greater control over the luminosity of the pigments and allowed for revisions—something that fresco painting did not permit due to its fast-drying nature. However, this technique, although artistically ambitious, would later contribute to the painting’s rapid deterioration.

II. Artistic Innovations and Significance

Composition

Leonardo’s composition is one of the most innovative aspects of The Last Supper. Unlike earlier depictions, where figures were scattered around the table, he placed all thirteen figures (Jesus and his twelve disciples) on the same side of the table. This bold choice created an immediate connection between the viewer and the narrative scene. It also allowed Leonardo to showcase each apostle’s unique reaction to the announcement of the betrayal, with gestures and expressions that are distinct and nuanced.

By arranging the figures this way, Leonardo created a sense of intimacy between the subjects and the audience. The apostles are grouped in threes, their gestures directed toward or away from Jesus, capturing the emotional and psychological complexity of the moment.

Perspective

Leonardo’s mastery of perspective is one of the painting’s most defining characteristics. He used linear perspective to draw the viewer’s eye directly to the figure of Jesus, who is positioned at the center of the composition. The architectural elements in the background, with their converging lines, direct focus to Christ’s serene yet sorrowful expression, contrasting with the animated gestures of the apostles around him. This use of perspective creates depth and realism, emphasizing the centrality of Jesus in the composition and the significance of the moment.

Psychological Depth

One of the most striking features of The Last Supper is its psychological depth. Each figure reacts to Jesus’s announcement with a distinct emotional response, reflecting the turmoil and shock of the revelation. From Peter’s vehement gesture of disbelief to the reserved, tense posture of Judas, Leonardo captures the inner emotional landscapes of the apostles. Judas, notably, clutches a bag of silver, symbolizing his role as the betrayer, while his body recoils from the rest of the group, isolated in both spirit and form.

Symbolism

Leonardo also incorporated subtle yet powerful symbolic elements into the painting. For example, the overturned salt cellar in front of Judas is a traditional symbol of betrayal and bad luck. Additionally, Jesus’s hands, positioned in a gesture that mirrors the Eucharist, allude to the forthcoming institution of the Holy Communion. These symbolic details deepen the painting’s spiritual resonance, inviting viewers to contemplate the larger religious and theological themes at play.

III. Deterioration and Restorations

Environmental Factors

Unfortunately, Leonardo’s experimental technique had long-term consequences for the painting’s preservation. Within a few decades, the work began to deteriorate due to the instability of the materials used. The refectory’s environmental conditions also played a role, with the wall being exposed to moisture and temperature fluctuations, exacerbating the damage. Unlike traditional frescoes, which bind pigment directly to plaster, Leonardo’s method lacked durability.

Human Impact

Over the centuries, The Last Supper suffered significant damage not only from environmental factors but also from human interference. The refectory was used for various purposes, including as a storage room, and the painting was neglected for extended periods. At one point, a doorway was cut into the wall, removing part of the lower section of the painting, including Christ’s feet.

The painting also faced threats from war and previous restoration attempts. During World War II, the refectory was bombed, and although the walls remained intact, vibrations and exposure further damaged the artwork.

Major Restoration (1978-1999)

Between 1978 and 1999, the most extensive restoration project of The Last Supper took place, led by Pinin Brambilla Barcilon. This restoration aimed to stabilize the painting, which had been overpainted and covered with grime. Layers of dirt and previous restorations were meticulously removed, revealing Leonardo’s original vision. However, the restoration was controversial, as the changes in color and tone were drastic, and some critics argued that too much of the original had been lost. Despite these concerns, the restoration ultimately improved the painting’s overall condition, ensuring its survival for future generations.

IV. Cultural Impact and Interpretations

Early Copies

The fame of The Last Supper led to numerous copies being made, with some of the earliest versions created by Leonardo’s own students. Two notable examples are the versions by Giampietrino, which is now housed in the Royal Academy of Arts in London, and another by Andrea Solari, located in Tongerlo Abbey in Belgium. These copies are invaluable, as they provide insights into the details of the original work that have been lost over time.

Artistic Homages

Throughout history, The Last Supper has inspired countless homages and reinterpretations by artists from various movements and periods. Salvador Dalí’s surrealist rendition, The Sacrament of the Last Supper, reimagines the scene through a dreamlike, mystical lens. Mary Beth Edelson’s feminist version places women in the roles of the apostles, challenging traditional gender roles in religious iconography. Meanwhile, Andy Warhol’s pop art series transforms the image into a commentary on consumerism and mass reproduction.

Literature and Film

The painting has also made a significant impact on literature and film. Mary Shelley, in her book Rambles in Germany and Italy, provided a vivid description of the work’s emotional depth. Films like Luis Buñuel’s Viridiana and the TV show MASH have featured the painting or referenced it in creative ways, showcasing its lasting influence on popular culture.

Controversies and Speculations

In recent years, The Last Supper has been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories, most notably those popularized by Dan Brown’s novel The Da Vinci Code. These theories suggest hidden meanings and symbols within the painting, including claims about Mary Magdalene and the Holy Grail. While such interpretations have been largely debunked by art historians, they reflect the enduring fascination with the artwork and its perceived mysteries.

V. Conclusion

Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper is an enduring testament to his genius, blending artistic innovation, psychological insight, and spiritual symbolism. Despite its history of deterioration and controversy, the painting continues to captivate audiences, serving as both a profound religious statement and a milestone in the history of art. The cultural impact of The Last Supper is vast, influencing artists, writers, and filmmakers alike, while its legacy as a masterpiece remains unquestioned.

@mr.unitednations

Leonardo da Vinci’s mural of The Last Supper located in Milan/Milano Italy. #thelastsupper #leonardodavinci #milan #milano

♬ original sound – Mr. United Nations

• Spotify
• YouTube